
Algorithms
contributed
Tue, 1 Sep 2026, 14:00 - 14:00
- Efficient quantum circuits for high-dimensional representations of SU(n) and Ramanujan quantum expandersVishnu Iyer (UT Austin); Siddhartha Jain (UT Austin); Stephen Jordan (Google Quantum AI); Rolando Somma (Google Quantum AI)[abstract]Abstract: We present efficient quantum circuits that implement high-dimensional unitary irreducible representations (irreps) of SU(n), where n>=2 is constant. For dimension N and error eps, the number of quantum gates in our circuits is polynomial in log(N) and log(1/eps). Our construction relies on the Jordan-Schwinger representation, which allows us to realize irreps of SU(n) in the Hilbert space of n quantum harmonic oscillators. Together with a recent efficient quantum Hermite transform, which allows us to map the computational basis states to the eigenstates of the quantum harmonic oscillator, this allows us to implement these irreps efficiently. Our quantum circuits can be used to construct explicit Ramanujan quantum expanders, a longstanding open problem. They can also be used to fast-forward the evolution of certain quantum systems.
- Hiding, Shuffling, and Cycle Finding: Quantum Algorithms on Edge ListsAmin Shiraz Gilani (University of Maryland); Daochen Wang (University of British Columbia); Pei Wu (The Pennsylvania State University); Xingyu Zhou (University of British Columbia)[abstract]Abstract: The edge list model is arguably the simplest input model for graphs, where the graph is specified by a list of its edges. In this model, we study the quantum query complexity of three variants of the triangle finding problem. The first asks whether there exists a triangle containing a target edge and raises general questions about the hiding of a problem's input among irrelevant data. The second asks whether there exists a triangle containing a target vertex and raises general questions about the shuffling of a problem's input. The third asks whether there exists a triangle; this problem bridges the $3$-distinctness and $3$-sum problems, which have been extensively studied by both cryptographers and complexity theorists. We provide tight or nearly tight results for these problems as well as some first answers to the general questions they raise. Furthermore, given any graph with low maximum degree, such as a typical random sparse graph, we prove that the quantum query complexity of finding a length-$k$ cycle in its length-$m$ edge list is $m^{3/4-1/(2^{k+2}-4)\pm o(1)}$, which matches the best-known upper bound for the quantum query complexity of $k$-distinctness on length-$m$ inputs up to an $m^{o(1)}$ factor. We prove the lower bound by developing new techniques within Zhandry's recording query framework [CRYPTO '19] as generalized by Hamoudi and Magniez [ToCT '23]. These techniques extend the framework to treat any non-product distribution that results from conditioning a product distribution on the absence of rare events. We prove the upper bound by adapting Belovs's learning graph algorithm for $k$-distinctness [FOCS '12]. Finally, assuming a plausible conjecture concerning only cycle finding, we show that the lower bound can be lifted to an essentially tight lower bound on the quantum query complexity of $k$-distinctness, which is a long-standing open question.
- Quantum Search With Generalized WildcardsArjan Cornelissen (Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing); Nikhil S. Mande (University of Liverpool); Subhasree Patro (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven); Nithish Raja (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven); Swagato Sanyal (University of Sheffield)[abstract]Abstract: In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string x \in \{-1,1\}^n. An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost O(\sqrt{n} \log n) and a near-matching lower bound of \Omega(\sqrt{n}). Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight O(\sqrt{n}) upper bound. We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset \cal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}, where an algorithm may test whether x_S = b for an arbitrary S \in \cal{Q} and b \in \{-1,1\}^S of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when \cal{Q} is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning x is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions f : \{-1,1\}^n \to \mathbb{R} the ratio of the maximum value of f to the maximum (over T \in \cal{Q}) standard deviation of f on a subcube whose free variables are exactly T.' To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.
