
Algorithms
contributed
Mon, 31 Aug 2026, 15:30 - 15:30
- Classification and implementation of unitary-equivariant and permutation-invariant quantum channelsElias Theil (University of Copenhagen); Laura Mancinska (University of Copenhagen)[abstract]Abstract: Many quantum information tasks use inputs of the form $\rho^{\otimes m}$, which naturally induce permutation and unitary symmetries. We classify all channels that respect both symmetries—unitary-equivariant and permutation-invariant maps from $(\mathbb{C}^{d})^{\otimes m}$ to $(\mathbb{C}^{d})^{\otimes n}$— via their extremal points. Operationally, each extremal channel factors as \emph{unitary Schur sampling} $\rightarrow$ an \emph{irrep-level unitary-equivariant channel} $\rightarrow$ the \emph{adjoint unitary Schur sampling}. We give a streaming implementation ansatz that uses an efficient streaming implementation of unitary Schur sampling together with a resource-state primitive, and we apply it to state symmetrization, symmetric cloning, and purity amplification. In these applications we obtain polynomial-time algorithms with exponential memory improvements in $m,n$. Further, for symmetric cloning we present, to our knowledge, the first efficient (polynomial-time) algorithm with explicit memory and gate bounds.
- High-dimensional quantum Schur transforms and Quantum Fourier transform for the symmetric groupCarli Bruinsma (QuSoft and University of Amsterdam); Adam Burchardt (QuSoft and CWI); Jiani Fei (Stanford); Dmitry Grinko (QuSoft and University of Amsterdam); Martin Larocca (Los Alamos National Laboratory); Maris Ozols (QuSoft and University of Amsterdam); Sydney Timmerman (Stanford); Vladyslav Visnevskyi (QuSoft, University of Amsterdam, and QMATH, University of Copenhagen)[abstract]Abstract: The quantum Schur transform has become a foundational quantum algorithm, yet even after two decades since the seminal 2004 paper by Bacon, Chuang, and Harrow (BCH), some aspects of the transform remain insufficiently understood. Moreover, an alternative approach proposed by Krovi in 2018 was recently found to be incomplete. In this submission, we present a corrected version of Krovi's algorithm along with a detailed treatment of the high-dimensional version of the BCH Schur transform. This high-dimensional focus makes the two versions of the transform practical for regimes where the local dimension $d$ is much larger than the number of qudits $n$, with corrected Krovi's algorithm scaling as $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/2})$ in gate and depth complexity, and BCH as $\widetilde{O}(\min(n^5,nd^4))$. Krovi's version of Schur transform crucially relies on the quantum Fourier transform for the symmetric group. To that end, we revisit a quantum Fourier transform algorithm by Kawano and Sekigawa. After a careful analysis, we correct their count of elementary one- and two-qubit gates and circuit depth up from $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^3)$ to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{7/2})$. This stems from our observation that Kawano and Sekigawa's analysis treats certain complicated multi-qubit operations as elementary. We also correct a mistake in how they label the basis vectors of a certain Hilbert space, simplify their algorithm by removing an unnecessary gate, and expand significantly on the implementation details of the algorithm. Our work addresses key gaps in the literature, strengthening the algorithmic foundations of a wide range of results that rely on Schur--Weyl duality and Quantum Fourier Transform over the symmetric group in quantum information theory and quantum computation.
- Dequantization Barriers for Guided Stoquastic HamiltoniansShrinidhi Teganahally Sridhara (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, LaBRI, France); Yassine Hamoudi (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, LaBRI, France); Yvan Le Borgne (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, LaBRI, France)[abstract]Abstract: Stoquastic Hamiltonians form an important class of quantum Hamiltonians, with applications to combinatorial optimization, analog computation, and adiabatic algorithms. The absence of a sign problem makes stoquastic Hamiltonians particularly amenable to classical simulation and dequantization techniques. Many such approaches rely on the availability of a guiding state, that is, a state with non-negligible overlap with the true ground state. This raises a fundamental question: can a suitably chosen guiding state always suffice to dequantize the preparation of stoquastic ground states? We answer this question in the negative by constructing a family of stoquastic Hamiltonians, represented as adjacency matrices of carefully designed graphs, for which classical algorithms cannot efficiently sample from the ground-state distribution -- even given the optimal guiding state. Our graphs are built from a certain type of high-girth spectral expanders, to which self-similar trees are attached. This builds on and extends prior work of Gilyén, Hastings, and Vazirani [Quantum 2021, STOC 2021], which ruled out dequantization for a specific stoquastic adiabatic path. We strengthen their result by ruling out any classical algorithm for guided ground-state preparation, while also providing a derandomized construction.
